Courtesy of Joseph Hall and his RSS mercenary, a RSS feed for MGM v. Grokster from the EFF case archive:
The briefs filed so far include:
Briefs of Petitioners (entertainment companies)
- Brief for Motion Picture
Studio and Recording Company Petitioners [PDF 352K]- Brief for Songwriter and Music
Publisher Petitioners [PDF 932K]Amicus Briefs Supporting Petitioners
Brief of the Progress and Freedom Foundation [PDF 172K]
Brief of the United
States Solicitor General’s Office [PDF 112K]Brief of the Business
Software Alliance [PDF 156K]Brief of Law
Professors, Economics Professors and Treatise Authors in Support of
Petitioners [PDF 188K]Brief of Law and Economics
Professors in Support of Petitioners [PDF 56K]Brief of the Defenders
of Property Rights in Support of Petitioners [PDF 60K]Brief of State Attorneys General in
Support of Petitioners [PDF 256K]Amicus Briefs Neutral as to Result
Brief of Senators
Leahy and Hatch in Support of Neither Party [PDF 112K]Brief of the
American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) in Support of
Vacatur and Remand [PDF 92K]Brief of Video Software
Dealers Association (VSDA) Suggesting Reversal [PDF 308K]Brief of Professor Lee A. Hollaar in
Support of Neither Party [PDF 204K]Brief of Audible Magic,
Digimarc and Gracenote in Support of Neither Party
Ed Felten looks at briefs submitted by the Solicitor General and a group of “anti-porn and police organizations,” Grokster Briefs: Toward a More Regulable Net : “These briefs are caught between nostalgia for a past that never existed, and false hope for future technologies that won’t do the job.”
Previously: Ninth Circuit Affirms Grokster Ruling (including actual analysis), P2P in the 9th Circuit, Again, NYT on Grokster, Seeking Cert in Grokster, Grokster briefs, Supremes grant cert in Grokster, Grokster, Brand X and the ‘Net, Supreme Geekery
